Skip to main content

Light at the End of Darkness

It might not be tomorrow; it might not be in ten years; eventually, however, the dawn of secularism will rise. Not to wax utopian, but it is hard to foresee how an interconnected world can fail to embrace the liberal ethos of free speech, the separation of government and religion, and the valuation of human lives over dogma and ideology.

As of late, there have been quite a number of attacks on Enlightenment (I hesitate to say “Western”) values of free debate and reason. Too many demagogues have found it worthwhile to impugn the free exchange of ideas for the sake of protecting this or that group’s sacred values. Freedom from being offended has replaced the freedom to express one’s views in the public sphere. Whether it is the Christian right’s “War on Christmas,” the feminist left’s war on the biological differences between men and women, or the Muslim right’s war on the criticism of Islam (not to mention Islam’s literal war of global Jihad), pluralism has had quite a difficult time surviving. In any case, the fact that opinions are like assholes (pardon the cliché), gives us hope that, in time, the purveyors of dogma will be left behind along with the dregs of Medieval Christianity, Nazism, and Stalinism.  

No doubt, religious and political dogma exhibit the characteristics of a hydra—that is, when you cut off one branch, two more are sure to fill the void. We have to remember, however, that progress may not be measurable in months, years, decades, or even centuries. How long did it take for Europe to outgrow its superstition-infused Dark Ages? At the risk of using another cliché, with two steps forward on the road to humanism, there is bound to be an occasional step back. Our world is an interconnected demon whose technological tools have no other recourse but the free exchange of ideas on a global scale. When everyone’s aunt blogs about the abuse of women in India, and everyone’s cousin tweets about the execution of blasphemers in Iran, the world is sure to take notice. Yes, people will find ways to cloister themselves into their respective niches of politically- and religiously-filtered information. But due to the very nature of the internet (a venue where I am offered cures for erectile dysfunction despite my lack of need for them), at least some of the time, everyone will be exposed to opinions that they disagree with. From this, I take hope. 


Popular posts from this blog

Mindfulness and the Search for the Self

In his book, Minding Closely: The Four Applications of Mindfulness, B. Alan Wallace instructs readers to engage in mindfulness meditation as a methodical practice. Now, I'm no mindfulness guru, but I trust that Wallace's instructions accurately reflect the traditional practice of Tibetan mindfulness. In any case, in addition to a philosophical discourse on the foundations of mindfulness that is a bit too anti-materialist for my liking, Wallace lays out a step-by-step guide for hopeful practitioners that is free of "being at one with..." abstractions.

The first titular application that Wallace presents is mindfulness of the body. This involves mindfulness of the breath, which is the foundation of many contemplative practices, and, according to Wallace, is a worthwhile entryway to shamatha, the calming of the mind via a focus on a single aspect of your experience--in this case, your breath. Mindfulness of the body also includes whatever sensations and perceptions might …

Cultural Balms for the Unruly Mind

The fruits of logical thought are undeniable. Its mathematical and astronomical excursions have taken us to the moon. Its physiological and medical incarnations have cured diseases such as smallpox and given robotic limbs to individuals who had lost theirs. Its philosophical and scientific ruminations have brought us closer to understanding the origins of the universe in the Big Bang and the origins of mankind in the savannas of Africa.

The less linear, more intuitive and fast-paced mode of information processing is the counterpoint to logical thought. It is more “hot.” It encompasses not one, but many competing interests, all vying for control of one’s goals, attitudes, and behaviors. So influential is this subterranean world of heuristics and emotions that even the logical stream falls prey to its bias.

The problem, as discovered by Dr. Henry Jekyll, is reconciliation. Owing to the multitude of programs and sub-programs populating our modular minds, it is often difficult to find corre…

A Pox on Both Your Houses: The Bipartisan Hatred of Free Speech

The intolerant left may have just found a partner in the censorious right. Of course, this is nothing new; neither side has been an immaculate paragon of free speech rights, despite self-righteous protestations of adherence to the First Amendment.                 Late in the evening on Tuesday, Feb. 7, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) took to the Senate floor in opposition to the confirmation of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) as the incoming attorney general, one of President Trump’s administration appointments. In her vigorous attack on Sessions’ nomination, Sen. Warren invoked old criticisms of Sessions from the late Sen. Edward Kennedy and Coretta Scott King that focused on Sessions’ civil rights record. Though a more meaty argument by Warren may have been made if she were to have destroyed Sessions’ despotic positions on the U.S.’s drug policy and civil asset forfeiture, her opportunity to object to Sessions’ appointment on her own terms should have been respected.   …